cheshirenoir: (Default)
cheshirenoir ([personal profile] cheshirenoir) wrote2008-06-04 11:31 am

The NerdGod Delusion

Warren Ellis has posted a nice little rant about Post Singularity nutters.

(Stop looking at me that way!)

Yes I find the concepts of Singularity events fascinating.
Yes I know too much of the finer details. (Mind you anyone with an interest in Nano and has read Kurzweil probably knows some of the finer details)
Yes I suspect an "Information Event Horizon", past which we can make no predictions, is possible.
Yes I did make career decisions based on the possibility.
No I don't think it has to happen.
No I don't think a post singularity world will nessecarily be a nice place for us meatheads.

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_fustian/ 2008-06-04 11:04 am (UTC)(link)
Ellis (and other Unbelievers ;) fails to allow for the Star Trek/Neuromancer phenomenon; the "if we can imagine it, we can build it" idea which has worked for many, many apparently impossible technologies. It's not quite the wikialistic equivalent of "clap if you believe in fairies", but in some ways it's close. Basically, the more engineers that have been exposed to the idea of something technological, the more likely it is that they'll eventually work out a way to build it. Since there's nothing inherently impossible about general AI (even if you're religiously opposed to the idea of machine consciousness), given its commercial value alone it doesn't take much to suggest that it's in fact inevitable (as long as someone else's eschatology doesn't intervene. From there to the Singularity is, well, not exactly a leap of faith.